Because of that here is no need for an ' EAC' type secure ripper for DVDs. I am no expert (hopefully someone else will better explain this), but it has something to do with differences in error correction and data blocks/sectors, etc. There's a difference between ripping an audio CD and ripping a DVD. Look different with DVDFab looking better. The differences I see are not visible on a PC screen but when blown up on a 50" Kuro, the pictures EAC is slower but it is exact while nero might be approximating when error You might want to post in the Slysoft forums, makers of CloneDVD, maybe they can help you over there.Īs an example, if you rip a song with nero you may not get as good a rip as if you ripped Unless you give more details on the settings used it's kind of hard to help you. ![]() Clearly somethings up with your settings. Everyone so far has told you that there should be no difference between the two rips IF no compression was used, that's the truth. The way I see it, people are trying to help you out. These same people probably wouldn't see a difference between Visio PlasmasĪnd Pioneer elite Plasmas. It'sĪ waste of time for me to post when people just want to say it isn't so without exploring ideas ![]() I will stop posting now since my original finding only seems to attract negative comments. I was camparing the DVDFab ISO rip to the CloneDVD2 rip. ![]() The ISO rips were played on a Pioneer Kuro 50" using a WD-TV to play the ISO over HDMI to the My comparisons were of ISO rips using DVDFab and also using CloneDVD2.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |